You won’t find a bigger supporter of the Sun’s ‘case against Choudary’ campaign than me.
For years I’ve been saying that this nutter, and hate mongers like him, are poisonous and destructive.
My run-ins with Choudary go way back.
When I stood for Parliament in 2005, he and his mates from Al-Muhajiroun called me a ‘kafar’, a non-believer, because I strongly believed in democracy and politics.
In 2006 on Newsnight he accused me of not being a Muslim because I wasn’t wearing a veil.
Three years later his mates pelted me with eggs and shouted obscenities at me in Luton as punishment for being a Muslim woman in a public role.
What really riled me, though, was seeing this man on the box, the day after the brutal murder of Drummer Lee Rigby, trying to glorify and justify this terrible attack.
It’s because I believe in free speech, that I believe in shouting people down rather than shutting them up – winning the argument, not banning the conversation.
That’s why I gladly took on British National Party leader Nick Griffin on Question Time – so I could challenge his racist views.
But I felt, in the days after Woolwich, it was deeply irresponsible for broadcasters to give large amount of airtime to this vile Choudary – allowing him to spout his bile to millions
He and his mob, who are no more than a handful of followers, do not represent British Muslims. His views are abhorred by British Muslims.
He doesn’t represent Muslims any more than Tommy Robinson and the English Defence League represents the English.
In fact, there are real similarities between people like Choudary and Robinson. Both perpetuate a polarised view of the world. Both practice the politics of fear. Both seek to divide communities.
They are two sides of the same rusty coin.
What’s laughable with Choudary is that he tries to dress up his hate speech as intellectual argument and theology.
He’s thinks the length of a man’s beard corresponds to the size of his intellect.
Never mind being unBritish, his behaviour is unIslamic.
His violent rhetoric is completely at odds with the teachings of the faith of Islam.
The fact is British Muslim communities are as repulsed and outraged by him as everyone else is.
Their strong, united, unequivocal condemnation of the cowardly attack in Woolwich, and rejection of hate speech like Choudary’s, was heartening in the midst of the horror.
We need to stand together with these communities, support them as they face reprisal attacks, and applaud them and join them as they say ‘not in my name’.
This week we had the first meeting of the task force on tackling extremism and radicalisation.
The Prime Minister charged each of us with finding any way and every way to send a clear message to extremists: we will not tolerate you.
We will support British Muslim communities in their campaigns to stop mobs like Choudary’s trying to take over their mosques.
We will show that there’s no place for them in our institutions – there’s nowhere for them to hide.
And, as the Sun revealed this week, we will look at ways to stop them living off the taxes of people who work hard and do the right thing, halting their State handouts.
Because that is one of the most galling things of all: Choudary taking home thousands of pounds in benefits when his only pasttime is peddling poison.
He may snigger about his ‘Jihad Seeker’s Allowance’. But the joke’s on him: the faith he professes to belong to, my faith, prohibits taking money when you’re fit to work and there is work available.
This is a hate preacher who doesn’t even practice what he preaches.
Just as communities and government have a role, broadcasters have a role too. Of course they have a right to interview who they want.
But they also have a responsibility too. Because every one of Choudary’s appearances undoes the hard work of interfaith, community-building work that people do every day.
That’s the other task in hand: creating a more integrated society – one which is resilient enough to stand up to those who are hell-bent on dividing us.
A resilient society is one whose members sign up to common values.
It is a place where people demonstrate fairness, tolerance and responsibility.
Where everyone feels pride in our nation and pride in the brave people who defend our nation, like Drummer Rigby.
Like it or lump it, that’s the British deal.
And if people don’t like it, they can, as I said to Choudary many years ago, make life easier for us all and get off our island.
By Joe Murphy
London has a “golden opportunity” to become the global centre of the booming Islamic finance business, a Cabinet minister will say tonight.
Baroness Warsi wants the City to respond to the potential of a sector set to expand by £400 billion in the next two years, offering billions in earnings as well as funding for major infrastructure projects to benefit the country.
“It’s about making Britain the preferred choice for the Muslim world to invest in and do business in,” the senior Foreign Office minister will tell the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies.
Islamic finance has already helped to fund some of the capital’s newest landmarks, including the Shard, the Olympic Village and redevelopments at Chelsea Barracks and Harrods.
“Each is a powerful reminder of the sector’s rapid rise and the importance of engaging with potentially lucrative new markets in the Muslim world and beyond,” the minister will say.
“It is not a silver bullet but it is a golden opportunity.” Her speech will come ahead of the ninth World Islamic Economic Forum this October in London, the first in a non-Muslim country.
She will reveal that the Government is considering a major overseas promotion for UK financial institutions and is looking at establishing a regulator and accreditation for educational courses.
Islamic finance requires ethical fin-ancing arrangements that avoid Riba, or the lending of money at exorbitant rates — prohibited in Islamic law. Leasing deals and forms of joint venture are among ways major investments can be set up in compliance with the rules.
Globally the market has grown 50 per cent faster than traditional banking and was less hit by the financial crash.
Baroness Warsi will say: “There is a clear demand which must be met and, in order to retain London’s status as the financial centre of the world, the City must respond.”
Immigration is one of the biggest political issues of our time – yet for too long we weren’t allowed to discuss it for fear of being labelled racist.
Remember Gillian Duffy? In 2010, when the Rochdale pensioner raised her concerns about the numbers of people coming into Britain, Gordon Brown called her a bigot.
She and thousands like her were deemed narrow-minded for questioning Labour’s mass immigration policy – a policy that saw 2.2 million migrants arrive during Labour’s 13-year rule.
At the time, we were consistently told that this was for economic reasons, that we needed more newcomers to boost productivity.
In fact, it was also a politically motivated ploy to change the make-up of Britain. According to former Labour adviser Andrew Neather, it was designed to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.
But after a decade of misguided social engineering, today’s politicians have a responsibility to confront this issue; as Conservative politicians, I believe it is our duty.
To do this we need to change the nature of the debate – and we’ve had some success. As the then chair of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission Trevor Phillips said, David Cameron has deracialised the immigration dilemma.
Cutting the numbers of immigrants has nothing to do with race but to do with the pressure on services such as schools, hospitals and housing.
To use a former Conservative election mantra, it’s not racist to limit immigration and our aim has always been to cut it.
That is why we announced last week in the Queen’s Speech that the new Immigration Bill will stop illegal immigrants being able to access public services, make it easier for us to deport foreign criminals, and change the law to stop spurious appeals.
I can’t think of anyone who would argue that British taxpayers should subsidise healthcare or benefits for those who are not entitled to them.
As an immigration lawyer, I saw too many unmeritorious cases, legal loopholes, delays to proceedings and claims that were nothing more than cons and scams.
As the daughter of an immigrant, I have no hesitation in confronting this issue and saying this is not about the colour of people’s skin, it’s about the capacity of our country.
Nearly a decade ago, while canvassing on the streets of my hometown of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, it became clear that the pace of change in our communities was creating a sense of unease.
Labour’s dispersal policy, where huge numbers of asylum-seekers were dropped into small towns and villages, had serious social consequences.
Large numbers of predominantly young male asylum seekers were moved to West Yorkshire. Families who had been used to living next door to each other for generations suddenly found they were next to large groups of young men.
Small villages on the outskirts of Wakefield, already challenged by multiple deprivation issues, suddenly found themselves the unwilling hosts of large and traumatised communities fleeing war zones.
Fights on the streets and racial attacks became an all-too-often occurrence, with both locals and new arrivals feeling unsupported, unsafe and uneasy.
This is important. We rely on people to get along and live alongside each other comfortably but if people start to feel a sense of unease, it starts to eat away at the fabric of society.
Too often the economic case for more immigration is made; it’s time to make the economic case for less immigration.
So often those people who are struggling at the bottom end of the social sphere – struggling with schools, jobs and access to good healthcare – are themselves from minority ethnic backgrounds.
They’re not immigrants but second or third generation Bangladeshi, Somali or Pakistani.
I talk about this because it matters and it’s personal. The backlash of far-Right extremism that foments because of this underlying current of anxiety is directed at people like my children, simply because they are not white. We have as much of an interest in this as anyone.
Even those on the Left have been forced to admit that immigration is a problem, yet it is those on the Right who have credibility on this issue.
I genuinely believe the Conservatives have got the correct vision and I also know we’re starting to deliver.
In three years, we have managed to get a grip on Britain’s out-of-control immigration, cutting the numbers of those coming here by a third.
This has been achieved by what Theresa May has been doing: Cracking down on bogus colleges and reforming the student visa system, capping the number of people who come here and tightening up our borders.
As a result, net immigration into the UK in the year ending June 2012 was 163,000 compared with 235,000 in June 2010.
This is still way too high; we need to go further and faster. Labour introduced convoluted procedures for what they thought were controls but they didn’t work.
The system was so overloaded and inefficient, there was a sense that people thought that if they delayed their case for long enough, they would be allowed to stay. They were right.
So our measures are not only fair, they’re long overdue. I know what benefits immigration can bring.
When my father arrived in Dewsbury from the Punjab, he got a job in the rag mills.
Hard work and an in-built sense of wanting to improve his life took him from being a mill worker to a mill owner.
The fact is we wouldn’t be the country we are today without the people who came here after the War – people like my dad – to work in our industries and help rebuild the country.
Britain wouldn’t be competing in the global race without the races from around the globe that make up our diverse nation.
We are rightly proud that Britain is a tolerant, diverse society – and that is something we must protect. We will always be open to the brightest, the best and those genuinely in need. What we can’t do is open the doors to anyone and everyone.
For those who do come here to live, our message is equally robust. If you aspire to join our nation, if you aspire to come to these shores, then you must sign up to our shared values of fairness, responsibility and playing your part.
You must join our common language and make every effort to integrate into society. We are no longer a soft touch and there are no more free rides.
As the Minister who is responsible for integration, I am working hard on policies that support this message.
As a mainstream, responsible party we must not be ashamed or frightened to make the case as to why these controls are essential.
We have to acknowledge that people such as Gillian Duffy have legitimate concerns and we must be the ones to articulate a solution.
This is nothing to do with current electoral realities, nor is it a repositioning of the party. On the contrary, I think we’ve grown more confident.
Now we need to communicate what we have already achieved, and we need to continue to confront the issues that our predecessors thought too taboo.
An icon, a stalwart and a revolutionary, Baroness Thatcher turned Britain’s fortunes around at a moment when we needed her most.
As a working-class Muslim girl from West Yorkshire, she became my political inspiration – my idol.
The daughter of a grocer showed that anything was possible. Her story of social mobility struck a real chord with so many of Britain’s ethnic minority communities.
The odds were always stacked against Margaret Hilda Roberts. But she showed that hard work, determination and steadfastness trump circumstances.
Her biggest influence was her father, Alfred Roberts. “I owe everything to my father,” she once said. “He brought me up to believe all the things I do believe.”
It was his traditional, British values – of freedom and fairness, hard work and common sense, responsibility and the importance of family – upon which the conviction of this self-proclaimed ‘conviction politician’ was based.
But Mrs Thatcher, as she was then, didn’t just show people they could get on in life; she enabled them to do so.
Think of the number of British Asians that have been able to buy their own homes, set up their own businesses – as my father did – and build a better life for themselves, thanks to her policies.
She truly recognised the unique contribution Britain’s disapora communities. As she said when she opened the Ismaeli Centre in 1985: “Britain is now, more than ever, a multicultural society.
“We need not be afraid that these new influences will somehow threaten the ‘British way of life’: on the contrary, a new resilience derived from diversity can only strengthen Britain.”
I often cite these words today when I argue that our secret weapon in the global race – in which we are pitted against the world’s rapidly expanding economies – are the races from around the globe which make up our diverse nation.
The growing resilience Britain derives from its diversity – in business, in the arts, in public services, in technology – is something of which I know Mrs Thatcher would be proud.
Of course there are many, many reasons why her decade-defining career will be celebrated, not least for the dignity in which she held herself on the international scene.
Many people talk about the Falklands, but for me another key moment was her foresight on the Balkans conflict.
I hope she will be particularly remembered for her brave and bold stance on the events of Bosnia in the 1990s.
As early as 1992 she was crying out for international action, arguing that a massacre of the Bosniaks in the besieged territories was only a matter of time.
In her article for the New York Times – entitled ‘Stop the Excuses. Help Bosnia Now’ – she argued: ‘Hesitation has already proved costly. The matter is urgent. There are perhaps a few weeks left for a serious initiative before it is too late and a Serb victory is accomplished, with terrible long-term consequences.’
Sadly, with the horrific events in the town of Srebrenica in 1995, when 8,000 men and boys were murdered by Bosnian Serbs, she was proved correct. It was yet another moment in which she was right.
Last year, when we celebrated the contribution of British Ugandan Asians, 40 years after their expulsion, I remember hearing about the photograph of the then Prime Minister, Edward Heath, hanging proudly above these families’ fireplaces.
For me, and for many British Asians, the image of Mrs Thatcher will also take pride of place.
With a career as long, as impactful and as world-changing as that of Baroness Thatcher, there is a danger that we might overlook many of her important achievements.
For instance, in the days following her very sad passing, little has been said of her attitude towards Britain becoming an increasingly diverse place. She set out her stall about the changing face of the UK when she opened the Ismaeli Centre back in 1985.
“Britain is now, more than ever, a multicultural society,” she said. “We need not be afraid that these new influences will somehow threaten the ‘British way of life’: on the contrary, a new resilience derived from diversity can only strengthen Britain.”
In those words she asserted that a multi-racial, multi-ethnic, multi-faith Britain would be a stronger Britain. They are words I quote very often when arguing that in the global race – in which we are pitted against the world’s rapidly expanding economies – we have a secret weapon: the races from around the globe which make up our diverse nation.
Mrs Thatcher, as she was then, backed up this belief by creating opportunity for people, regardless of their background. Her policies unleashed people’s enterprise and independence – be it by allowing them to buy their council house or enabling them to start their own business, as my father did.
Through her own story – the journey from living above her family shop to Number 10 Downing Street – she demonstrated that one’s past should never determine their future. It was something that really resonated with me as a young Muslim girl growing up in West Yorkshire, and inspired me to go into politics.
Many years later, when Mrs Thatcher was no longer Prime Minister, another of her actions really struck a chord with me: her stance on the conflict in Bosnia. As early as 1992, she was crying out for international action. She clearly argued that a massacre of the Bosniaks in the besieged territories was only a matter of time.
It is quite remarkable now to read her article for the New York Times from that time – entitled ‘Stop the Excuses. Help Bosnia Now’ – in which she argued: ‘Hesitation has already proved costly. The matter is urgent. There are perhaps a few weeks left for a serious initiative before it is too late and a Serb victory is accomplished, with terrible long-term consequences.’ With the hindsight we have now, knowing the horrific events that swept across the town of Srebrenica in 1995, in which 8,000 Bosniaks men and boys were murdered, we know just how prescient those words were.
So as we reflect upon the career of our the first woman to lead our country – our greatest peacetime Prime Minister – it is important to remember those points in her career which might otherwise be forgotten.
The government is “finally dealing” with Islamophobia in the UK, the minister for faith and communities has said in a personal film made for the BBC.
Baroness Warsi visited the Altrincham Islamic Cultural Centre and heard from trustee Amjad Latif about relations with the local community, and attacks on people and buildings.
The former Conservative Party chairman looked at problems relating to attacks and discrimination against ethnic communities, and recalled her description of the ‘dinner table test’.
She also spoke to Dr Matthew Goodwin of the University of Nottingham.
To watch her piece go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-22264706
A government minister has spoken out against “antisemitism in the Muslim community” in Britain.
Baroness Warsi, the Minister for Faith and Communities, said that anti-Zionism was often a mask for anti-Jewish hatred.
“I am aware that anti-Israeli sentiment can sometimes be a cover for antisemitism. As the Community Security Trust will tell you, antisemitic attacks spiral in the UK when there is increased unrest in the Middle East.”
But she insisted that it was “absurd” to suggest that criticisms of Israeli policy would “automatically equal to criticisms of Jews”.
Baroness Warsi, who is a Muslim, admitted that the relationship between the Muslim and Jewish communities was “not an easy subject to tackle.”
But she believed that British Muslims should “celebrate” the success of Anglo-Jewry “I would go as far as saying, indeed, emulate it “.
The minister also said Muslims and Jews should unite against the threat posed by far-right movements such as the English Defence League, a nationalist group whose supporters display Israeli flags during anti-Islamist protests.
“There will always be those who use the underlying resentment in the Middle East to play out their own political agendas,” she said.
“I know that, like me, the British Jewish community is disgusted by the use of the Israeli flag at English Defence League rallies.
“We need to be robust when extremists hijack our faith. An attack on one faith, is an attack on all faiths.”
Baroness Warsi was speaking at the launch of an exhibition celebrating Righteous Muslims who saved Jews during the Holocaust attended by around 50 people
Jonathan Arkush, vice president of the Board, said he thought the minister’s remarks “were highly significant.
“They were remarkably frank because she, as a Muslim and a government minister, was accepting that there is some way to go in combating antisemitism in the Muslim community,” he said.
“Baroness Warsi had one ask of the Jewish community – and that is to stand out against the attempts of far right wing bodies. The EDL’s pathetic attempts to gain Jewish support have come a cropper. They’ve totally failed and will continue to fail.”
Laura Marks, the senior vice president of the Board, added: “We hear so much about communities fighting each other, but we need each other in so many ways.
“Our religious practices – whether circumcision or ritual slaughter or even faith schools – need defending. We face challenges when our own community prejudices stand in the way of our strong community ties.”
Commander Mak Chishty, a Muslim police officer, called for more interfaith initiatives to “combat Islamaphobic and antisemitism. They bring communities together and let them know about the historic relationship that does exist”.
The Righteous Muslim Exhibition features the photos and stories of 70 people who were named Righteous Among the Nations by Yad Vashem.
The exhibition, in central London, will be open to organisations, including schools, by appointment for the six weeks.
By Kounteya Sinha
LONDON: UK has decided to pay tribute to the sacrifices made by the 1.2 million men from the Indian Army who fought for Britain in the First World War during a visit to the battlefields of France and Belgium.
Kicking off the campaign, Britain’s Faith and Communities minister Baroness Warsi visited the grave of Indian soldier Khudadad Khan – the first Indian recipient of the Victoria Cross (the highest military honour) in Belgium.
She stopped at the village of Hollebeke where she laid a wreath at a memorial to Sikh soldiers. This was where Indian soldiers saw some of their first action in the early months of the war.
Baroness Warsi said “Our boys weren’t just Tommies, they were Tariqs and Tajinders too. A picture of a soldier in a turban is not what we immediately associate with the Great War. And yet so many men from so far away came to Europe to fight for the freedoms we enjoy today. Their legacy is our liberty, and every single one of us owes them a debt of gratitude.”
“It was particularly poignant to see the endless names – of Khans and Singhs, Alis and Atwals – listed on the memorials. It was also fascinating to hear how arrangements for religious and cultural observances, such as Ramadan and wearing turbans, were part of their lives, even on the frontline. I will make it my mission to ensure that the centenary is a chance for everyone to learn about the contribution of the Commonwealth soldiers.”
As part of the government’s programme to commemorate the forthcoming centenary of the 1914-1918 conflict, she went to the Western Front, where 140,000 men from the Indian army fought alongside Britain.
During the First World War, 1.2 million soldiers from undivided India served with the Allies, 74,000 of whom made the ultimate sacrifice.
Baroness Warsi’s first stop was the Neuve-Chapelle Indian Memorial in France, which honours the 4,742 Indian soldiers on the Western Front who have no known grave.
Neuve-Chappelle was the battle, in March 1915, where the Indian troops corps fought their first major battle as a unit, suffering heavy casualties.
At Lijssenthoek Military Cemetery, the second largest site in Belgium, she saw the grave of a Hindu fallen soldier alongside comrades from the Chinese Labour Corps.
Baroness Warsi also visited Grootebeek British Cemetery, which includes graves of soldiers who came from her parents’ village in Gujar Khan, Pakistan.
She met the owner of the nearby farm, who recounted his father’s experiences when the barn was turned into a hospital for wounded Indian soldiers.
Her visit ended at the Menin Gate in Ypres, which includes the names of the 54,000 of the fallen who have no known graves – including 414 Indians.
Baroness Warsi also had the chance to read accounts of the letters of soldiers as she visited the areas where they had served.
One, a Sikh sepoy, convalescing in England, wrote to his brother: “With a shout to our Guru we hurl ourselves forward. The enemies bullets scorch our heroes, while machine guns and cannons spread their shot about us.”
Another, a Muslim soldier who wrote from France to his brother in India, said “What better occasion can I find that this to prove the loyalty of my family to the British Government? The flag of victory will be in the hands of our British Government. Be not at all distressed. Without death there is no victory, but I am alive and very well, and I tell you truly that will return alive to India.”
Britain’s Minister for Faith was in Rome this week representing the UK government at the new Pope’s inauguration at the Vatican.
Baroness Warsi, who is also a Senior Foreign Office Minister, was at the installation of Pope Francis alongside the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester on March 19.
In a packed St Peter’s Square, the delegation took their place alongside the world’s dignitaries to watch Pope Francis formally become head of the Catholic Church – which has 1.2 billion followers worldwide, including 6 million people in the UK.
Baroness Warsi said:
“It was a true privilege to be part of such a historic event and to witness up-close this very spiritual moment.
“I was heartened to be surrounded by so many people, of so many different faiths. It goes to show the importance the Catholic Church and their new Pope place on their relationship with other faiths. As I looked out into the crowd, I saw flags from so many nations – showing the true global reach of the church.
“Pope Francis already showed how down to earth he was in his first few days as pontiff. He cemented his reputation as a pope of the people at his inaugural Mass when he mingled with the crowds. His homily, calling upon everyone to protect the poor, provided a universal message, to people of all faiths and none.”
STUDENTS at a Crosland Moor school were inspired by a talk from Baroness Warsi of Dewsbury, Britain’s first female Muslim Cabinet minister.
Dewsbury-born Baroness Warsi, who asked students to call her by her first name Sayeeda, spoke to year 11 students at Moor End Academy.
Her visit was part of the Speakers for Schools initiative.
Former solicitor Baroness Warsi, who became a life peer in 2007, served in Prime Minister David Cameron’s Cabinet as minister without portfolio from May 2010 to September last year.
In a speech full of down-to-earth honesty and humour, Baroness Warsi spoke about her ‘journey’ from growing up in Dewsbury and studying at Birkdale High School and Dewsbury College to an ill-fated bid to become Tory MP for Dewsbury in 2005 and her eventual elevation to the House of Lords and the Cabinet.
Baroness Warsi also spoke about the barriers she had faced and overcome.
After her speech, students spent half-an-hour questioning the Baroness, showing a surprising level of knowledge about politics.
Sylvia Greaves, year 11 learning leader, said the visit was perfectly timed as students had been looking at how people communicated.
She added: “Year 11 students were able to observe at close quarters someone who is a skilled speaker.
“Baroness Warsi deployed both wit and candour and I personally found her story fascinating and was very glad she came, and so were year 11, who surprised themselves by becoming more engaged in the extended question and answer session than they had anticipated.”
Baroness Warsi’s visit was made possible by Speakers for Schools, an organisation set up by the BBC’s Robert Peston, through which state schools may apply to have an inspirational speaker visit their school, free of charge.
Any school is able to apply and application forms can be found at http://www.speakers4schools.org
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
